Stealthy external pod seen on a F-22
- Banned
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: 16 Mar 2020, 02:09
More at:
F-22 Raptor Spotted Flying With Stealthy Underwing Pods
The pods are likely part of an ongoing initiative to retain the F-22's potency until its replacement arrives.
By Tyler Rogoway - Feb 8, 2022
See: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/4 ... rwing-pods
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 10052
- Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 04:14
Wild guess but I would go with "Jammer" of some type... ![Neutral :|](./images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif)
![Neutral :|](./images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif)
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 10052
- Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 04:14
ChippyHo wrote:Photon torpedo tubes
Those are only available on the Canadian Version!
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
- Banned
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: 16 Mar 2020, 02:09
Maybe they are going ahead with a stealthy Airst.
We talked about this months ago.
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=25562&start=30
We talked about this months ago.
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=25562&start=30
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 6069
- Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
- Location: Jaffrey NH USA
The front shaping jives with that, but not the apparent materials. This could be a loads test mockup
"Spurts"
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
-PFD Systems Engineer
-PATRIOT Systems Engineer
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
-PFD Systems Engineer
-PATRIOT Systems Engineer
- Active Member
- Posts: 171
- Joined: 30 Jul 2013, 10:58
The front is close to the shape of an IRST fairing, it's way too small to be an offensive jammer, F-22 doesn't need more ESM aperture, and it doesn't make sense to add more complicating antenna aperture for limited self protection in radio frequency to a stealthy fighter if it doesn't address the supposed UHF/VHF frequency flaw. Plus you have APG-77 for that.
From just the pictures at the moment my 2c is with IRST. But if they're validating aerodynamics now the design is likely locked in and maybe close to production. If that's the case in operation only 1 is carried as awkward as it may look? Or pair option for maximum field of view?
From just the pictures at the moment my 2c is with IRST. But if they're validating aerodynamics now the design is likely locked in and maybe close to production. If that's the case in operation only 1 is carried as awkward as it may look? Or pair option for maximum field of view?
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 5365
- Joined: 20 Mar 2010, 10:26
- Location: Parts Unknown
Between this and the reflective metallic coating, things sure are getting interesting.
They've apparently been true to their word with respect to upgrades to keep it ahead of the threats. The 9x Block II, the AIM-120D, helmet mounted sight (is that still coming)? and now this.. I'm not sure what else they can do to improve her, short of new motors - which clearly won't be happening. Nor is it needed, methinks.
We didn't get nearly as many as we needed, but at least they're keeping it current to outpace the threat. It may yet get its opportunity to shine with the recent European deployment/Ukraine situation. Hopefully, just the "message" that deployment sends can keep it from happening. Unlikely though, considering the vast number of Russian assets now in theater. Including I read today Mig-31K's with Kinzal hypersonic missiles.
Yikes.
They've apparently been true to their word with respect to upgrades to keep it ahead of the threats. The 9x Block II, the AIM-120D, helmet mounted sight (is that still coming)? and now this.. I'm not sure what else they can do to improve her, short of new motors - which clearly won't be happening. Nor is it needed, methinks.
We didn't get nearly as many as we needed, but at least they're keeping it current to outpace the threat. It may yet get its opportunity to shine with the recent European deployment/Ukraine situation. Hopefully, just the "message" that deployment sends can keep it from happening. Unlikely though, considering the vast number of Russian assets now in theater. Including I read today Mig-31K's with Kinzal hypersonic missiles.
Yikes.
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 5694
- Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 08:31
- Location: Finland
Pair would definitely have wider field of view and that would also allow for accurate long-range passive ranging capability given the wide separation of the sensors. I also think that these are IRST systems for what mmm said.
- Active Member
- Posts: 171
- Joined: 30 Jul 2013, 10:58
hornetfinn wrote:Pair would definitely have wider field of view and that would also allow for accurate long-range passive ranging capability given the wide separation of the sensors. I also think that these are IRST systems for what mmm said.
It does give me second thoughts on my guess, if nothing else no one has slapped 2 identical pods on the same airframe despite the benefits in theory. So it would be atypical to do so at least.
The other possibility I could think of is that they have split functionalities like Lantirn though not in the exact same fashion. Maybe frequency band, laser, what not but in any case meant to operate in pairs as a full suite. But they do look identical externally.
Interestingly there's no visible air intake(maybe recessed ones on the sides? I can't say for sure), if EO only you can probably make cooling and power work, less likely with active RF.
- Senior member
- Posts: 309
- Joined: 28 Oct 2006, 10:07
- If these elements are Pods then why the Fiducial Markers?
The use of FM is to analyze weapons and other means release experiments
- Looks like the heads of the elements have windows like some modern missiles got (JSM/NSM/SOM) to contain sensors such as EO, imaging, IR and so on..
- Could it be a new stealthy missile in the early stage of testing (body only)?
The use of FM is to analyze weapons and other means release experiments
- Looks like the heads of the elements have windows like some modern missiles got (JSM/NSM/SOM) to contain sensors such as EO, imaging, IR and so on..
- Could it be a new stealthy missile in the early stage of testing (body only)?
- Active Member
- Posts: 171
- Joined: 30 Jul 2013, 10:58
fang wrote:- If these elements are Pods then why the Fiducial Markers?
The use of FM is to analyze weapons and other means release experiments
- Looks like the heads of the elements have windows like some modern missiles got (JSM/NSM/SOM) to contain sensors such as EO, imaging, IR and so on..
- Could it be a new stealthy missile in the early stage of testing (body only)?
That's a possibility as no one really knows anything for sure. I find that a bit too much of an effort to align the edge with F-22's in particular, unnecessarily slim with unnatural tapering at the tail for A-G munition, and having too many features omitted like inlets or folding wing surfaces to be of much testing value even as inert article. Also one could argue turning F-22 into a cruise missile carrier isn't very pressing.
Although assuming they are EO pods I wonder how much it could expand F-22's A-G self targeting if there's such capability at all. If nothing else SDB II/Stormbreaker was fit checked on the internal stations.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests